Changing Attitudes to Imprisonment in Scotland

Evolution of Perspectives:

Over recent years, there has been a notable shift in attitudes towards imprisonment and the treatment of offenders in Scotland. Both the Scottish Government and a majority of politicians in the region have reconsidered the effectiveness of imprisonment as a means of rehabilitating offenders. The prevailing belief is that prison sentences, in some cases, may contribute to an increased likelihood of reoffending upon release.

Ineffectiveness of Prison Sentences:

• Evidence of Ineffectiveness: There is growing evidence that simply giving an offender a prison sentence may not address the root causes of criminal behaviour and might increase the likelihood of reoffending post-release.
• Call for Rehabilitation: A report by Audit Scotland in November 2012 emphasised the need for the Scottish Government to tackle re-offending by focusing on rehabilitation. Offenders often return to prison within months due to a lack of effective interventions addressing the reasons for their criminal behaviour.

Audit Scotland Report Recommendations:

• Existing Services: The report highlighted that there are approximately 1,300 different services available for offenders, both within prisons and in the community.
• Effectiveness Concerns: Despite the plethora of services, there are concerns about their effectiveness. Some known effective services are not consistently provided.
• Cost Implications: Recognizing the cost of re-offending to the country, estimated at £3 billion per year by the Scottish Government, there is an imperative to enhance the effectiveness of existing interventions.

Varied Opinions:

• MSP Perspectives: While the law limiting short sentences received parliamentary approval, there is not unanimous support among Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs). Some advocate for even shorter sentences, while others argue for a broader shift towards alternatives to prison sentences.

---

Changing Attitudes to Imprisonment in Scotland

Legislative Changes:

• Limiting Short Sentences: In 2010, the Scottish Parliament enacted legislation to curtail prison sentences to three months or less, unless there are compelling reasons for a longer sentence.
• Alternative Approaches: This legislative move is perceived as a step towards encouraging the use of alternatives to prison and addressing the issue of prison overcrowding.

Conclusion:

The changing attitudes towards imprisonment in Scotland reflect a broader acknowledgement of the limitations of traditional punitive measures. Emphasising rehabilitation and exploring alternatives to short sentences aligns with addressing the root causes of criminal behaviour and reducing the societal and economic impact of re-offending.