DOCUMENT 1
These are two accounts of the bombing of the German city of Dresden, 1945 - Junior Cycle History - Question 1 - 2010
Question 1
DOCUMENT 1
These are two accounts of the bombing of the German city of Dresden, 1945. A is an eye-witness account by German schoolgirl, Karin Busch. B is the accoun... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:DOCUMENT 1
These are two accounts of the bombing of the German city of Dresden, 1945 - Junior Cycle History - Question 1 - 2010
Step 1
Why did Karin Busch believe that Dresden would not be bombed?
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Karin Busch believed Dresden would not be bombed because she considered it a safe city due to its cultural significance. During the war, towns like Dresden were often seen as protected areas, which led her to think it would be spared.
Step 2
Give one piece of evidence from Document 1A to suggest that the bombing of Dresden was particularly heavy.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
One piece of evidence from Document 1A suggesting that the bombing was particularly heavy is the description of the 'inferno of wind and firestorm,' where people were jumping into the river to escape, indicating the severity of the situation.
Step 3
What two reasons does Air Vice-Marshall Donald Bennett give for the bombing of Dresden?
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Air Vice-Marshall Donald Bennett provides the following two reasons for the bombing of Dresden: 1. The Russians asked them to bomb Dresden; 2. The German civil service was based there, and there were over 80,000 German troops close to Dresden.
Step 4
Give one reason why primary sources are useful to historians.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Primary sources are useful to historians because they provide first-hand or eye-witness accounts that establish a direct link with the past, allowing for a more authentic understanding of historical events.
Step 5
Why is it important for historians to obtain evidence from more than one source?
97%
117 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
It is important for historians to obtain evidence from more than one source to cross-check the information and test the reliability of the material, ensuring a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of historical events.
Join the Junior Cycle students using SimpleStudy...