Photo AI

DOCUMENT 1 These are two accounts of the bombing of the German city of Dresden, 1945 - Junior Cycle History - Question 1 - 2010

Question icon

Question 1

DOCUMENT-1--These-are-two-accounts-of-the-bombing-of-the-German-city-of-Dresden,-1945-Junior Cycle History-Question 1-2010.png

DOCUMENT 1 These are two accounts of the bombing of the German city of Dresden, 1945. A is an eye-witness account by German schoolgirl, Karin Busch. B is the accoun... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:DOCUMENT 1 These are two accounts of the bombing of the German city of Dresden, 1945 - Junior Cycle History - Question 1 - 2010

Step 1

Why did Karin Busch believe that Dresden would not be bombed?

96%

114 rated

Answer

Karin Busch believed Dresden would not be bombed because she considered it a safe city due to its cultural significance. During the war, towns like Dresden were often seen as protected areas, which led her to think it would be spared.

Step 2

Give one piece of evidence from Document 1A to suggest that the bombing of Dresden was particularly heavy.

99%

104 rated

Answer

One piece of evidence from Document 1A suggesting that the bombing was particularly heavy is the description of the 'inferno of wind and firestorm,' where people were jumping into the river to escape, indicating the severity of the situation.

Step 3

What two reasons does Air Vice-Marshall Donald Bennett give for the bombing of Dresden?

96%

101 rated

Answer

Air Vice-Marshall Donald Bennett provides the following two reasons for the bombing of Dresden: 1. The Russians asked them to bomb Dresden; 2. The German civil service was based there, and there were over 80,000 German troops close to Dresden.

Step 4

Give one reason why primary sources are useful to historians.

98%

120 rated

Answer

Primary sources are useful to historians because they provide first-hand or eye-witness accounts that establish a direct link with the past, allowing for a more authentic understanding of historical events.

Step 5

Why is it important for historians to obtain evidence from more than one source?

97%

117 rated

Answer

It is important for historians to obtain evidence from more than one source to cross-check the information and test the reliability of the material, ensuring a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of historical events.

Join the Junior Cycle students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;