Ava Darcey purchased headphones from Headline Electronic store for £195.99 - Leaving Cert Business - Question A - 2015
Question A
Ava Darcey purchased headphones from Headline Electronic store for £195.99. After two weeks the speaker in her left ear started to skip and then stopped completely. ... show full transcript
Worked Solution & Example Answer:Ava Darcey purchased headphones from Headline Electronic store for £195.99 - Leaving Cert Business - Question A - 2015
Step 1
State the law that protects Ava in this case.
96%
114 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
The law that protects Ava in this case is the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980. This legislation provides consumers with rights to ensure that goods purchased are of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose.
Step 2
Outline two forms of redress that Ava is entitled to in the above case.
99%
104 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Refund: Ava can request a full refund since the headphones were found to be defective after purchase.
Replacement: She can ask for a replacement product that meets quality standards, ensuring she receives functional headphones.
Step 3
Explain two benefits of Ava taking her case to the Small Claims Court.
96%
101 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Cost-effective: The Small Claims Court offers a low-cost mechanism for resolving disputes, with minimal legal fees involved, making it accessible for Ava.
Quick Resolution: The court aims to provide a swift resolution to consumer claims, ideally resolving cases without lengthy processes.
Step 4
Outline two reasons why the advertisements below are unlawful under the Employment Equality Act 1998.
98%
120 rated
Only available for registered users.
Sign up now to view full answer, or log in if you already have an account!
Answer
Discrimination based on nationality: The advertisement for the hotel receptionist is discriminatory as it specifies the applicant must be Irish, which is in violation of the Employment Equality Act.
Gender discrimination: The advertisement for the van driver prefers a male applicant, which is unlawful under the act as it discriminates based on gender.
Join the Leaving Cert students using SimpleStudy...