The Greatest Personal Privation

Overview

• "The Greatest Personal Privation" is an erasure poem by Tracy K. Smith, taken from her 2018 collection Wade in the Water.
• The poem is crafted from a 19th-century letter written by Mary Jones, a white slave owner, to her family. The letter details her supposed "privation" of losing enslaved individuals, Patience and Phoebe.
• Smith uses the technique of erasure poetry to highlight the dehumanising language and self-centred perspective of Jones while giving voice to the enslaved individuals whose suffering is erased in the original letter.
• The poem explores themes of slavery, systemic racism, historical injustice, and communal responsibility.
• Through fragmented language, repetition, and irony, Smith reveals the cruelty of slavery and its enduring legacy, inviting reflection on how history shapes the present.

---

Detailed Summary

Stanza 1:

The poem opens with a striking line that sets the tone: "It is a painful and harassing business" (line 1). This phrase refers to the sale of enslaved individuals, though the tone reflects the slave owner's self-centred lamentation rather than concern for the people involved. The speaker describes the enslaved as "Have no comfort or confidence in them" (line 3), reflecting a dehumanising attitude that reduces them to commodities.

The stanza also references the enslaved being "Subject to sale" (line 7), and the speaker claims to have prayed for them: "I have prayed for those people / Many, many, very many times" (lines 12–13). This ironic plea highlights the hypocrisy of someone complicit in slavery seeking spiritual solace.

Stanza 2:

The tone shifts to a personal lament: "Much as I should miss Mother, / I have had trouble enough" (lines 15–16). The speaker distances herself from responsibility, portraying the situation as an inconvenience. The phrase "Only waiting to be sent / Home in peace with God" (lines 17–18) reflects an attempt to absolve herself of guilt, invoking religion as justification.

Stanza 3:

The poem introduces the broader impact of slavery. The speaker acknowledges the loss: "The whole country / Will not come back / From the sale of parent / And child" (lines 22–25). This brief acknowledgement of the human tragedy is juxtaposed with the speaker's continued focus on herself, as she claims ignorance: "We should not know / What was for our own good" (lines 28–29).

Stanza 4:

The tone becomes more reflective: "We wish to act. We may yet" (line 33). However, the speaker reveals hesitation, tied to a hypocritical contemplation of "character and moral conduct" (line 35). The final lines of the stanza express the tension between wanting to do good and the potential for evil: "If good, we shall be glad; if / Evil, then we must meet evil / As best we can" (lines 37–39).

Stanza 5:

The final stanza escalates into desperation, using repetition for dramatic effect: "Father, mother, son, daughter, man. / And if that family is sold: / Please –" (lines 40–42). The fragmented phrases and repetition of "Please –" (lines 43, 45, 47) convey a breaking point as the speaker struggles with the enormity of systemic violence. The stanza closes on a haunting note: "I have no more –" (line 51), highlighting the profound loss and silence imposed on the enslaved.

---

Themes

The Dehumanisation of Enslaved Individuals

The poem reflects the inherent cruelty of slavery through the lens of a slave-owner's perspective. The enslaved individuals are described in transactional terms, as seen in "Subject to sale" (line 7), reducing them to property. The speaker's lack of empathy for their suffering highlights the brutal dehumanisation central to the institution of slavery. This theme is underscored by the irony of the title, which implies the slave owner's "privation" is greater than the enslaved people's suffering.

Hypocrisy and Moral Blindness

Throughout the poem, the speaker attempts to justify her role in slavery through religious language, claiming, "I have prayed for those people" (line 12). Her appeals to faith and morality, alongside her unwillingness to address the harm she causes, reflect a profound moral blindness. This theme critiques how religion was often used to excuse or ignore the inhumanity of slavery.

Collective Responsibility and Historical Injustice

The poem shifts focus from personal lamentation to the broader implications of slavery: "The whole country / Will not come back / From the sale of parent / And child" (lines 22–25). This acknowledges the generational trauma and systemic impact of slavery. The repeated use of "we" in lines such as "We wish to act" (line 33) and "We must meet evil" (line 38) suggests the need for collective responsibility in addressing the legacy of this injustice.

---

Structure and Form

1. Erasure Poem

This poem is an erasure piece crafted from a historical letter by a slave owner. By selectively removing parts of the original text, Smith recontextualises the letter to critique its content and expose the dehumanisation of enslaved individuals. The erasure allows the hidden voices of the enslaved to emerge while simultaneously highlighting the cruelty of the original language.

2. Free Verse

The poem is written in free verse, with no regular rhyme or metre. This structure mirrors the fragmented, raw nature of the historical text. The lack of a formal pattern underscores the disjointed and chaotic lives of those impacted by slavery.

3. Fragmented Lines and Repetition

The poem's frequent use of fragmented lines and repeated words, such as "Please –" (lines 42, 43, 45, 47), conveys desperation and urgency. The unfinished sentences reflect the historical silencing of enslaved individuals, symbolising lives that were forcibly interrupted.

4. Stanza Progression

The poem is divided into five stanzas, moving from personal lament to a broader reflection on slavery's legacy:

• Stanza 1: Introduces the slave owner's lament, juxtaposed with the dehumanisation of the enslaved.
• Stanza 2: A more personal focus on religious justification.
• Stanza 3: Acknowledges the generational trauma caused by slavery.
• Stanza 4: Contemplates morality and the potential for good or evil.
• Stanza 5: Concludes with fragmented cries for justice, invoking communal responsibility.

5. Sparse and Simple Language

The poem's language is intentionally sparse, as in "I have no more –" (line 51). This simplicity reflects the stark reality of historical injustice, leaving the reader with a sense of unfinished business, just as slavery left wounds that remain unhealed.

---

Poetic Techniques

1. Irony

• The poem's title, "The Greatest Personal Privation", is deeply ironic. While the speaker laments her own inconvenience, the true suffering lies with the enslaved individuals.
• Phrases like "I have prayed for those people" (line 12) reveal the hypocrisy of the speaker's supposed compassion, which is undermined by her actions. Effect: The irony critiques the self-absorbed perspective of the slave owner, exposing the moral blindness of those complicit in slavery.

2. Repetition

• The repeated plea, "Please –" (lines 42, 43, 45, 47), builds a sense of urgency and desperation.
• The phrase "Many, many, very many times" (line 13) emphasises the ongoing trauma and the repeated prayers for forgiveness that fail to address the real harm. Effect: Repetition heightens the emotional tension and evokes the relentless suffering endured by enslaved individuals and their families.

3. Fragmentation

• Lines like "I have no more –" (line 51) and the broken phrases in the final stanza convey a sense of incompleteness and unresolved grief.
• The fragmented structure reflects the silenced voices of enslaved people, mirroring their interrupted lives. Effect: The fragmented form symbolises the historical erasure of enslaved voices, forcing readers to confront the gaps in historical narratives.

4. Biblical Allusion

• The speaker appeals to religion with phrases like "Home in peace with God" (line 18) and "peace with God and the world" (line 11).
• These references highlight the use of faith as a justification for slavery, while the poem's tone challenges this rationale. Effect: The Biblical allusions critique the moral blindness of using religion to excuse systemic injustice, exposing the hypocrisy of the slave-owning class.

5. Dual Perspective

• The poem alternates between the speaker's self-absorbed viewpoint and the hidden voices of the enslaved. For example, the word "Belonging" (line 2) contrasts the slave-owner's perspective of possession with the human reality of being owned. Effect: This duality forces readers to grapple with the contrasting experiences of the oppressor and the oppressed, illuminating the depth of historical injustice.

6. Juxtaposition

• Lines like "The whole country / Will not come back / From the sale of parent / And child" (lines 22–25) juxtapose the speaker's acknowledgement of the loss with her continued self-interest. Effect: Juxtaposition highlights the speaker's inability to fully grasp the gravity of the injustice, reinforcing the critique of her perspective.