Photo AI

Read Source 1A - NSC History - Question 1 - 2019 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 1

Read-Source-1A-NSC History-Question 1-2019-Paper 1.png

Read Source 1A. 1.1.1 According to the source, which member of ExComm was part of: (a) The conservative group (b) The liberal group 1.1.2 Comment on the differe... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Read Source 1A - NSC History - Question 1 - 2019 - Paper 1

Step 1

According to the source, which member of ExComm was part of: (a) The conservative group

96%

114 rated

Answer

The conservative group included prominent figures such as General Taylor or Dean Acheson, who advocated for a more aggressive stance against the Soviet Union.

Step 2

According to the source, which member of ExComm was part of: (b) The liberal group

99%

104 rated

Answer

The liberal group was represented by individuals like Adlai Stevenson, who preferred diplomatic solutions over military action.

Step 3

Comment on the different views that members of ExComm had regarding the deployment of missiles to Cuba.

96%

101 rated

Answer

Members of ExComm had polarized views on the missile deployment. The conservatives believed a strong military response was necessary to deter Soviet aggression, arguing that showing weakness could invite further threats. Conversely, the liberals contended that diplomacy and restraint were essential to avoid escalating tensions and potential conflict.

Step 4

Quote TWO reasons from the source that suggest Robert Kennedy was against an air strike on Cuba.

98%

120 rated

Answer

One reason Robert Kennedy opposed an air strike was the potential for civilian casualties resulting from such an attack. He also believed that an air strike could provoke a larger conflict with the Soviet Union, undermining diplomatic efforts.

Step 5

Explain why you think some members of ExComm did not support the blockade of Soviet ships that intended entering Cuba.

97%

117 rated

Answer

Some members of ExComm likely viewed the blockade as a less forceful option that could limit the possibility of an armed confrontation. They might have believed that maintaining some level of diplomatic engagement with the Soviets would be advantageous, recognizing that aggressive actions could escalate tensions further.

Join the NSC students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;