QUESTION 5: THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST Explain to what extent compromises by different role players (political parties) remained a key feature that paved the way for a new political dispensation in South Africa in 1994 - NSC History - Question 5 - 2022 - Paper 2

The unbanning of organizations such as the ANC, PAC, and SACP in 1990, alongside the release of Nelson Mandela, marked critical compromises. These actions by the NP, led by President F.W. de Klerk, showed a willingness to negotiate and facilitated a climate conducive to dialogue.

The Groote Schuur Minute, issued on May 2, 1990, detailed agreements to release political prisoners and cease acts of violence. However, violence in regions like the Vaal Triangle highlighted the ongoing tensions. The willingness of both the NP and ANC to engage in negotiations despite violence was a significant compromise essential for progress.

Both the ANC and NP faced pressure during the State of Emergency, leading to the National Peace Accord. This agreement represented a compromise to stabilize relations among political parties and mitigate violence, reflecting the urgent need for a peaceful transition.

During the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) talks, parties struggled to agree on power-sharing. Compromises were necessary for progress, illustrating that collaboration among differing parties was vital to advance negotiations.

In concluding, the compromises made by various political parties were fundamental in transitioning South Africa towards democracy in 1994. These actions not only facilitated negotiations but also set a precedent for future collaboration in governance, demonstrating the role of political will in overcoming deep-seated divisions.