Photo AI

Refer to Source 3A - NSC History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1

Question icon

Question 3

Refer-to-Source-3A-NSC History-Question 3-2022-Paper 1.png

Refer to Source 3A. 3.1.1 List THREE organisations in the source that participated in the voting rights campaign in Selma on 2 January 1965. 3.1.2 Define the term ... show full transcript

Worked Solution & Example Answer:Refer to Source 3A - NSC History - Question 3 - 2022 - Paper 1

Step 1

List THREE organisations in the source that participated in the voting rights campaign in Selma on 2 January 1965.

96%

114 rated

Answer

The three organizations that participated in the voting rights campaign in Selma included:

  1. Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC).
  2. Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).
  3. Dallas County Voters League.

Step 2

Define the term voting rights campaign in your own words.

99%

104 rated

Answer

A voting rights campaign is a coordinated effort aimed at advocating for the right of individuals to register and vote, particularly focusing on removing barriers that prevent disenfranchised groups from participating in elections.

Step 3

Why do you think only two per cent of the local blacks appeared on the voters' roll in Selma?

96%

101 rated

Answer

The low percentage of local Blacks on the voters' roll can be attributed to several factors, including discriminatory practices that made it difficult for them to register, such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and intimidation from local authorities.

Step 4

Name the TWO leaders in the source that led the march from Selma to Montgomery on 7 March 1965.

98%

120 rated

Answer

The two leaders who led the march from Selma to Montgomery were Hosea Williams and John Lewis.

Step 5

Using the information in the source and your own knowledge, explain how demonstrators benefitted from media coverage of the 'Bloody Sunday' incident.

97%

117 rated

Answer

Demonstrators benefitted significantly from media coverage of the 'Bloody Sunday' incident as it drew national attention to their struggle for voting rights. This widespread publicity helped galvanize public support for their cause and put pressure on governmental authorities to address civil rights abuses.

Step 6

Give TWO reasons in the source that Major Cloud provided as to why the demonstration on 7 March 1965 could not continue.

97%

121 rated

Answer

Major Cloud provided the following reasons for halting the demonstration:

  1. The event was considered an unlawful assembly.
  2. He was not ready to listen and address the pleas of the protestors.

Step 7

Explain the implication of the statement, 'There will be no word', in the context of Major Cloud's attitude towards the activists.

96%

114 rated

Answer

The implication of the statement 'There will be no word' reflects Major Cloud's dismissive attitude towards the activists, indicating a lack of willingness to engage in dialogue or acknowledge their rights to protest.

Step 8

Comment on why you think the State Troopers used derogatory language when they addressed the demonstrators during the first march from Selma to Montgomery.

99%

104 rated

Answer

The State Troopers likely used derogatory language to assert dominance and dehumanize the demonstrators, which reflects the hostile atmosphere of racial tensions prevalent at that time.

Step 9

State THREE effects in the source that the tear gas, which had been used by the State Troopers, had on the marchers.

96%

101 rated

Answer

The effects of the tear gas on the marchers included:

  1. Causing physical discomfort and respiratory issues for many individuals present.
  2. Leading to panic and disarray within the crowd, resulting in a chaotic scene.
  3. Forcing demonstrators to retreat and temporarily halt their protest.

Step 10

Explain how the evidence in Source 3A supports the information in Source 3B regarding how the State Troopers dealt with the demonstrators at the Selma to Montgomery March on 7 March 1965.

98%

120 rated

Answer

The evidence in Source 3A shows that the State Troopers reacted violently, employing tear gas and physical intimidation against the demonstrators. This is corroborated by Source 3B, which illustrates how the authorities obstructed peaceful protests, highlighting a consistent pattern of aggressive responses towards the marchers.

Join the NSC students using SimpleStudy...

97% of Students

Report Improved Results

98% of Students

Recommend to friends

100,000+

Students Supported

1 Million+

Questions answered

;